Any other week, any other government…Posted: May 27, 2013
Amidst the furore over the Senate expenses scandal and Rob Ford, you could be excused for having missed what is a damning ruling from the Federal Court of Canada on the matter of fraud in the 2011 Federal election.
In his judgement on the application to annul six electoral results on the grounds of fraud, Justice Mosley found that “the evidence presented points to a concerted campaign by persons who had access to a database of voter information maintained by a political party.” This campaign, he finds, does constitute electoral fraud in those six ridings, albeit so defined with insufficient evidence regarding the impact on the outcome of those races. One might interpret that latter finding as “they attempted fraud, but their goals fell short.”
(You can read Justice Mosley’s full ruling here: http://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/703627/t-619-12-en.pdf )
Not to be over dramatic but these are the types of political stories I read about in daily newspapers while living and travelling for over two years in various developing countries, whose political systems, I should note, were at various stages of immaturity and ongoing development.
This certainly isn’t what I thought our proud, exemplary parliamentary system would devolve to.
But so it has.
To be fair, we don’t know who orchestrated this, nor who, if anyone, gave implicit approval to it. But the fact that a certain political party’s database was used to commit the fraud, and that this political party has, in the word’s of Justice Mosley (on pages 93/94 of his ruling), sought to “block proceedings by any means” makes one wonder.
That section of the ruling deserves special attention:
Despite the obvious public interest in getting to the bottom of the allegations, the CPC made little effort to assist with the investigation at the outset despite early requests. I note that counsel for the CPC was informed while the election was taking place that the calls about polling station changes were improper. While it was begrudgingly conceded during oral argument that what occurred was “absolutely outrageous”, the record indicates that the stance taken by the respondent MPs from the outset was to block these proceedings by any means.
I’m not trying to play Sherlock, but if you’re innocent, that last sentence seems a bit incongruent. Actually, it’s outrageous. Our democracy is far too important to be chiseled away at by conniving politicians and their partisans for the sake of a seat or two.
Yet this is the state of Canadian politics/our ruling party. Our elected officials obfuscate/lie/mislead. They read from prepared and approved statements, refuse to answer direct questions, bail out unscrupulous colleagues, hide behind immature attack ads that amount to bullying, and have allowed ideology to trump evidence in the crafting of policy.
It’s sad. To say we deserve better is such an understatement it’s almost humorous.
And yet here we are.
As someone who does enjoy committing sociology once in awhile, I can’t help but ask why?
And my answer to such questions is simple: people, and in this case, a certain subset of the people who run for office. Certainly not all of them, but if we are to judge this most recent period in Canadian federal politics , it certainly seems something is amiss amongst the ethics and morals of a sufficient number of them, who, for now, hold sufficient power so as to influence the direction of this country.
This needs to change.
 The six ridings are: Elmwood-Transcona, NipissingTimiskaming, Saskatoon-Rosetown-Biggar, Vancouver Island North, Winnipeg South Centre and Yukon.